> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>>Another possibility would be to use content filtering on one port, while > >>>not filtering on another port, everything with one http proxy... > > > >On 26.08 12:29, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > >>See the myport acl. > > > >Yes, I know about this possibility, but can I using this together with > >forwarded_for or other options?
On 26.08 23:57, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > It can be used almost anywere where you can use acls. > > forwarded_for is not acl driven. OK, so there's my question: is there a plan for (possibly) all config directives to be acl-driven? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Fucking windows! Bring Bill Gates! (Southpark the movie)
