hi, yes I have figured it out that it is more complex..you can say that again.
it is not that I am new to squid..have been using for quite some time..but as they say I was only using 10 percent of its extensive capabilities...now after reading the documentation I saw what all was possible and wanted to try it out..because the way I see it..it has all the features that M$ ISA has...so I can straightaway dispense with ISA if this works out.. that is why I wanted to integrate this with 2000 AD...no luck so far...will keep trying. best wishes, Jawed On 25 Sep 2004 at 13:30, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > There is no need of Samba when running on Windows. The Windows port > contains native Windows authentication helpers. > > On UNIX the approach using Samba is defenitely the way to go for NT Domain > / AD integration. > > > For AD it is also possible to use LDAP, but this is a little more complex > to configure and not as dynamic in features provided. > > Regards > Henrik
