On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
In what way is the "ufs" cache_dir type broken? I do see TCP_HIT/200 entries in access.log.
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE6-ufs_no_valid_dir
Regards Henrik
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
In what way is the "ufs" cache_dir type broken? I do see TCP_HIT/200 entries in access.log.
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/#squid-2.5.STABLE6-ufs_no_valid_dir
Regards Henrik