> >On 02.11 15:42, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > >>It may also be noted that recent experience indicates Squids cache_mem > >>performs some orders of magnitude worse than expected on large files..
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >ehm, could you please give us some details? On 03.11 11:20, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > Exponential increase in CPU usage the larger the cached object hit in the > cache_mem cache. that is a bug, not a feature, right? > Or in other words, using a large "maximum_object_size_in_memory" is a bad > idea if you are scarse on CPU. I use 256KB... so, IIUC, the problem is not in the big cache_mem but in big maximum_object_size_in_memory, right? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
