On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 16:50, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > I'd recomend using bigger disk cache - for accomodating week's traffic you > > > should have 30GB cache imho. Tuning up filesystem may help too, using xfs > > > or reisersfs (with notail option) on cache disk and probably use dedicated > > > cache drive. > > On 05.01 14:44, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > Nope... The book - "Squid - the definitive guide" shows that ext3 is > > still faster then reiserfs. > > > > Search the archives for the bit which I wrote and quoted from the book > > I remember that this was mentioned some time ago here. I just do not > believe it for now. Maybe if I'll do my own tests, or if someone will make > tests I would trust... > > does the book SHOW that ext3 is the best, or does it SAY that it's the > best? :)
Yeah.. It SHOWS via nice graphs. But it's on old Hardware and on 2.4 kernels -- Ow Mun Heng Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! Neuromancer 17:47:34 up 8:45, 5 users, load average: 0.42, 0.50, 0.45
