----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Wennie V. Lagmay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "squid-users @ squid-cache.org" <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Delay Pool


>
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
>
> > Thank you Henrik and Dev, I was able to configure it.
> >
> > acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
> > acl ipaddr1  src 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0
> > acl ipaddr2  src 192.168.11.0/255.255.255.0
>
> These can be joined into a single acl, simplifying things somewhat.
>
> acl clients src 192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.11.0/255.255.255.0
>
> > delay_pools 1
> >    delay_class 1 3
> >        delay_access 1 allow ipaddr1
> >        delay_access 1 allow ipaddr2
> >        delay_access 1 deny all
> >         delay_parameters 1 128000/128000 -1/-1   2000/8000
> >
> >
> > With the above config, I'm telling that the total bandwidth is 1Mbps,
per IP
> > block has no limit and per IP address have a commited rate of 16kbps
(when
> > the network is busy) and 64 kbps (when the network is not busy).
>
> This is not exacly what the above says.
>
> What it says is that each client gets a committed rate of 16 kbps (2000
> bytes/s) with a credit of 8000 bytes allowing them to download burts of
> up to 8000 bytes without delay after being idle.
>
> This is not related to the traffic level of other cliets. Only when the
> higher levels (network or global) runs short is the client limited by
> other traffic.
>
> but other than this it looks like a reasonable configuration.

Is there a way to implement my idea using delay_pool or I really need a
bandwidth shaper?

>
> > objective is for every client to have 64000 bits of bandwidth but as the
> > number of clients grows it will decrease to 16000bits but it is
guaranteed.
>
> I would probably use a somewhat bigger pool size to give the impression of
> this. Maybe 80000 or 160000.
>
> How fast connection do the clients have to the proxy?

clients to proxy is 128kbps  Im planning to implement variable bandwidth
from 16kbps commited to 128kbps (due to high bandwidth cost)

>
> Regards
> Henrik
>

Thank you and best regards,

Wennie


Reply via email to