lör 2006-10-28 klockan 20:39 -0700 skrev Bryn Hughes: > What I don't get is the cache_peer_access stuff.
It's only needed on the backend Squids, and only if you use cache_peer for routing the requests to the correct webserver. > The only thing that > should be accessing either 'back end' squid is the VPS. From the > example config it's not entirely clear what I should be setting here. That's controlled in http_access, or firewalling.. > The other thing I'm a bit confused about is how rewrite rules should > work in this scenario. Should all 3 squid boxes have the same > rewrite rules? I don't think I want the VPS trying to connect > directly to the back-end servers without going through the cache > hierarchy. Only the Squid closest to the end-users should do the rewrites. Once the request have hit the Squids it's processed in rewritten form. If you can I would recommend getting rid of the redirector however. There really isn't any good reason why redirectors should be used. It's much better to have the webserver do the right thing. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel