Hi Christos,

I guess that there is a misconfiguration with my ICAP server I'm
working on this.

Have you tried a configuration like this? It seems that service_3 will
never be actived.

icap_service service_1 reqmod_precache 0 icap://127.0.0.1:1344/wwreqmod
icap_service service_2 respmod_precache 0 icap://127.0.0.1:1344/wwrespmod
icap_service service_3 respmod_precache 0 icap://172.1.1.16:1344/respmod

icap_class filtro_url service_1 service_2 service_3
icap_access filtro_url allow all

Thanks,
Thiago Cruz

On 9/20/07, Christos Tsantilas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>   Works very well for me. How are you testing it?
> Maybe the problem is repeated ICAP service failures. In this case squid
> stops using the service.
>
> if you change the line:
> icap_service service_2 respmod_precache 0 .....
> to
> icap_service service_2 respmod_precache 1 .....
>
> What are you seeing?
>
> The squid bugzilla is here:
>  http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/
>
> Regards,
>    Christos
>
>
> Thiago Cruz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  I was testing Squid 3.0.PRE6-20070718 and the ICAP protocol was working
> >  fine. I've updated to  3.0.PRE7-20070919 and squid stop sending Respmod,
> >  although the Reqmod is ok, follow my conf:
> >
> >  icap_service service_1 reqmod_precache 0 icap://127.0.0.1:1344/wwreqmod
> >  icap_service service_2 respmod_precache 0 icap://127.0.0.1:1344/wwrespmod
> >  icap_class filtro_url service_1 service_2
> >  icap_access filtro_url allow all
> >
> >  I've tracked the connection and I can see ICAP server answering his
> Methods:
> >
> >  OPTIONS icap://127.0.0.1:1344/wwreqmod ICAP/1.0
> >  Host: 127.0.0.1:1344
> >
> >  ICAP/1.0 200 OK
> >  Allow: 204
> >  Encapsulated: null-body=0
> >  ISTAG: "001-000-000003"
> >  Max-Connections: 50
> >  Methods: REQMOD, RESPMOD, PROFILE, CERTVERIFY
> >  Options-TTL: 300
> >  Preview: 30
> >  Service: Webwasher 6.5.2.2676 (WW 6.5)
> >  Service-ID: ww
> >  Transfer-Preview: *
> >  X-Include: X-Authenticated-Groups,X-Authenticated-User,X-Client-IP
> >
> >
> >  Bugzilla?
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >  Thiago Cruz
> >
>
>

Reply via email to