On Wed, Dec 05, 2007, Chris Hostetter wrote: > : Hmm.. might be a good idea to try Squid-2.HEAD. This kind of things > : behaves a little differently there than 2.6.. > > Alas ... I don't think i could convince my boss to get on board the idea > of using a devel releases. then again, i'm not too clear on how > branch/release management is done in squid ... do merges happen from > 2.HEAD to 2.6 (in which case does 2.6.STABLE17 have the behavior you are > refering to?) or will 2.HEAD ultimately become 2.7 once it's more stable?
Squid-2.HEAD should eventually become Squid-2.7. > So it kind of seems like i'm out of luck right? my only option being to > try 2.HEAD which *may* have the behavior i'm describing. Its part and parcel with free software. We can be paid to test it in a lab and give you a certain answer if you'd like. :) -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
