Here's the bugzilla link to the bug: http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2139
On 12/13/2007 10:38 AM, Glenn Zazulia wrote: > Yes, I think so, and I suspect that it's not a simple configuration > parameter either but hard-coded. Without knowing where in the source to > look for this, I searched all files for explicit, static 256 byte > buffers, and I found quite a few. > > I'll file a bug. > > Thanks. > > Glenn > > -- > > On 12/13/2007 05:33 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> I suggest filing a squid bugzilla bug. I'm not sure what the limits >> are but I bet they're compile-time at the moment. >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007, Glenn Zazulia wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm using Squid 2.6.STABLE17 on Redhat & Windows, configured in a chain >>> of peers with custom auth & external acl helpers that manipulate the >>> proxyauth credentials/header. This works fine when the user:passwd >>> string is less than 256 bytes (prior to base64-encoding), but I noticed >>> that squid truncates anything larger than that. I didn't find any >>> stated header size limit in the RFCs (2616, etc.), and I'm wondering if >>> this is an arbitrary, static limit imposed by squid? If at all >>> possible, I need to increase that limit to 1 KB, and I'm wondering if >>> this can be done without patching the source. I didn't see anything >>> obvious in the config file or the docs. >>> >>> Thanks for any assistance that you could provide. >>> >>> Glenn Zazulia >>>
