Hi Tek,
I am planning on moving 1500 users to the proxy, ofcourse the system
will change (hardware wise). Performance of squid should be
important, I knew diskd was still in "test" mode, but I did not
expect 4 users even though it was running for 27 days to display this
error messages.
For my own info, if I move to ufs, and if ufs is pretty stable,
performance wise is it close to diskd or better.
Thanks
On Jan 21, 2008, at 1:57 AM, Tek Bahadur Limbu wrote:
Hi Monah,
Monah Baki wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running squid 2.6-stable17 on Freebsd 6.3. Machine is a 500MHz
with 512MB RAM.
Don't you think that your system is a little low on resources even
for a low number of users?
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/squid --enable-
storeio=ufs,coss,diskd,null --enable-underscores --with-large-
files --enable-large-cache-files --enable-delay-pools --disable-
ident-lookups --enable-snmp --enable-cache-digests --enable-
underscores --enable-kill-parent-hack --enable-removal-policies --
enable-async-io --enable-kqueue --enable-follow-x-forwarded-for
I think it's better to use "--enable-
storeio=ufs,aufs,coss,diskd,null" and remove "--enable-async-io".
In the end if DISKD does not work for you, then I guess you should
use UFS, AUFS or COSS.
Since you only have 4 users, all of them will work fine for you...
Thanking you...
In my squid.conf:
cache_dir diskd /usr/local/squid/var/cache 28000 32 512 Q1=72 Q2=64
Thanks
BSD Networking, Microsoft Notworking
--
With best regards and good wishes,
Yours sincerely,
Tek Bahadur Limbu
System Administrator
(TAG/TDG Group)
Jwl Systems Department
Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd.
Jawalakhel, Nepal
http://www.wlink.com.np
http://teklimbu.wordpress.com
BSD Networking, Microsoft Notworking
