The reference to 192.168.0.254 which are you looking when run route command is the default gateway.Your server is not resolving 192.168.0.254 to localhost.
--- Jorge Bastos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact I have 3 NIC's. > > Yes, the two interfaces I showed in the route print, > are defined in > /etc/network/interfaces. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: julian julian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: quinta-feira, 10 de Abril de 2008 15:47 > > To: Jorge Bastos > > Cc: squid > > Subject: RE: [squid-users] client ip's > > > > Jorge: have you set the network properly? Are you > > using 192.168.x.x net. The network parameter must > be > > wrote in > > ../ifcfg-eth0 and ../ifcfg-eth1 file (because I > > suspect that you have two nics). The route command > > shows some aspect of your network configuration. > > > > Julián > > > > --- Jorge Bastos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hum I got some news on this, > > > > > > I don't know why my system started to give me > this > > > information: > > > > > > Kernel IP routing table > > > Destination Gateway Genmask > > > Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > > > 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 > U > > > 0 0 0 eth0 > > > 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 > U > > > 0 0 0 eth1 > > > default localhost 0.0.0.0 > UG > > > 0 0 0 eth1 > > > > > > Kernel IP routing table > > > Destination Gateway Genmask > > > Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > > > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 > U > > > 0 0 0 eth0 > > > 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 > U > > > 0 0 0 eth1 > > > 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.254 0.0.0.0 > UG > > > 0 0 0 eth1 > > > > > > > > > The fact is that the hosts file is correct: > > > > > > cisne:~# cat /etc/hosts > > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > > > > > I only have this there > > > > > > I know this is not squid related but if you guys > can > > > give me a hand. > > > I have no idea why is it resolving 192.168.0.254 > to > > > localhost. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Jorge Bastos > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: sábado, 5 de Abril de 2008 21:23 > > > > To: 'Henrik Nordstrom' > > > > Cc: 'Amos Jeffries'; > squid-users@squid-cache.org > > > > Subject: RE: [squid-users] client ip's > > > > > > > > This already worked with some of the 3.0 > versions. > > > > Gonna try to play with my iptables rules and > let > > > you guys know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Henrik Nordstrom > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: sábado, 5 de Abril de 2008 19:38 > > > > > To: Jorge Bastos > > > > > Cc: 'Amos Jeffries'; > squid-users@squid-cache.org > > > > > Subject: RE: [squid-users] client ip's > > > > > > > > > > lr 2008-04-05 klockan 14:24 +0100 skrev > Jorge > > > Bastos: > > > > > > > > > > > I updated to last STABLE-4 on debian, but > this > > > still happens this > > > > > way. > > > > > > What can I do more? > > > > > > > > > > Good question. > > > > > > > > > > One thing you can try is to downgrade to > > > Squid-2.6. If that shows the > > > > > same symptoms the problem is not within > Squid > > > but most likely in your > > > > > firewall ruleset or something else relevant > to > > > how the connections > > > > end > > > > > up at your Squid. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
