tis 2008-05-27 klockan 10:41 -0400 skrev Troy: > A few days ago we had our squid proxy fail over to a backup > cache_peer. We are not sure what caused it to fail but it did not > fall back to the primary cache_peer. I thought I had read about a bug > that had been reported about this but not sure what it was or the bug > number. I would like to know if there is a way to monitor the > cache_peer directive and what cache_peer the proxy is using.
bug #1972, fixed in 2.6.STABLE15. Workaround until upgraded: Use the monitorurl feature. Regards Henrik
