>
> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There seemed to have been some discussion back in October
> > about BitTorrent. I just noticed that I had :
> >
> > 2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Requestheader contains NULL
> > characters
> > 2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '^SBitTorrent'
> > 2008/06/10 03:02:39| clientReadRequest: FD 27 (192.168.3.15:64673) Invalid
> > Request
> >
> > and
> >
> > 2008/06/10 05:02:01| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method
> > '<C1><94>V^W<A9>uk<DB>J8a<CB><BF>mx'2^_I<F5><DF><CE><97><F5>Mj<C4><97><B4><94><81>|<CE><9D><90><B3>
> > <9F>^W^P<BB>^Q<9D><EB>G<E2>/<87>S<C3>J<92><B6><94><AB><F8>J<BD><FA>?\8^_,<FC>y
> > <F7>^P<B0><F6><9D>1<96><EF><D9><BE><A0>E<90>xp<C1><C7>^?XRf^<86>^R<AD><AD><D6>i
> > ^A^E(<AC><D9>^B<C4>-x<AC><C2>^Da<E4>ESC<8D>T<DB>^X<FE>^Z9
> > '
> > 2008/06/10 05:02:01| clientReadRequest: FD 28 (192.168.3.15:58694) Invalid
> > Request
> >
> > dotted through my logs.
> >
> > I was just wondering if anything ever came of the discussion. It looks
> > like the user was trying to do it proxied, then stopped for 20 minutes, and
> > then found some other way out.
> >
> > I don't care if they use it, just wondered if there was a way to
> > fully support it.
>
> It's on my todo list a fair way down. Probably around 3.3.
> From 3.1 we have dropped a lot of the 'unsupported methods' issues. So
> the first attempts may get through.
>
> I'd put it down to a broken client software through. All the torrents I
> use are proxied properly and working.
>
Well, we ran into other problems we believe due in whole in some
cases, and part others, so the fact that Squid squawks is the least of our
problems. Now our AND our upstreams Cisco are complaining about Fragment
overlaps, and reassembly issues, etc. Bigger battle (Oh, and the fact our
primary providers antenna at our side seems to be uncontactable.) There
seem to be alot of other issues more pressing.....
Thanks for the reply though, we are on 2.6 if it matters...
Tuc
