tis 2008-06-24 klockan 11:30 -0700 skrev John Doe: > #miss_access deny from_localnet # Do I need this miss?
No, sibling relations automatically enforce this by using a Cache-Control header sent by the requesting Squid. > Questions: > 1. Anything wrong in the confs above? Do I need some cache_peer_access for > the siblings communication? Default for cache_peer_access is to consider the peer a candidate for all requests. > 3. If squids sits right next to the apaches (on a gigabit switch), can I not > use digests? cache digests is between the squids, and may be quite beneficial to you as ICP can then be skipped on known cache hits. > 4. If I want to handle "leeches" (using wrong referer) with a redirector > script, would the following work? Probably, but you may want to consider implementing this using an external acl instead of a redirector.. > 5. If I want the apaches to tell squid to cache for 1 week and squids to tell > clients to cache for 1 month, can I just useheader_replace like these? > > header_replace Expires Sun Jan 1 00:00:00 CET 2012 > header_replace Cache-Control max-age=2678400 Better to use a combination of max-age and s-maxage. What they are intended for.. > 6. Is there a way to prevent <shift>-reload from making squid ask apache when > the object is still in its cache...? Something like that? > > refresh_pattern 0 0% 0 ignore-reload Yes. Regards Henrik
