Sorry Adrian. Actually he told me its more complex. thats why i ask squid-users for an idea or work around for this.
With 302(move temporarily) and 303(see other) HTTP status code. 3XX code actually a redirect(correct me if im wrong) so what if squid will just follow the redirect before squid process its content... or squid will just bypass this redirects. So that the 303/302content will not be process by storeurl. by the way i've also tried; acl location rep_header Location . <- where 302/303 or redirect has always Location header(i think) cache deny location still not working so i assume cache deny is a request processing.... the only thing i know that works is; access_log ..... location my other weird idea(just for workaround) if we could inject no-cache to those content with header that has a Location in order impose proper caching is it possible? ----- Original Message ---- From: Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: chudy fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 11:28:19 PM Subject: Re: [squid-users] 302,303 redirect I've been talking to him in private about the store url ACLs that are possible. (The ACLs for the storeurl_access only works on request, not reply, making it a bit of a pain.) Yes, I told you chudy, fixing this up to cache youtube will take a bit more effort. :) What are you trying to do with the 302/303's? Email that to squid-users and I'll see what we can come up with. Adrian On Thu, Sep 11, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > chudy fernandez wrote: > >i have an configuration > >acl location rep_header Location . > >which would tell me that the content reply is a redirect now i wanna deny > >that so that it won't go inside my storeurl script > >storeurl_access deny location > > > >but storeurl_access is not a reply processing there when the content > >header has no no-cache or no-store it will became cache-hit 302 or 303 > >so is there any other way around doing this so it will not go to my > >storeurl script. > >I have attach my squid.conf > > > > Ah, right. That sounds like a problem for Adrian who created the > storeurl feature (cc'd). It would need reworking to be tested twice on > MISS requests. > > Amos > > > > > > >----- Original Message ---- > >From: Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: chudy fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org > >Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:47:43 PM > >Subject: Re: [squid-users] 302,303 redirect > > > >chudy fernandez wrote: > >>Is there a way the 302,303 or redirect contents will not be precess by > >>squid? > >>I've used storeurl feature since you cannot deny reply header i'm > >>wondering is there a way that these contents will bypass storeurl or it > >>will just go follow the redirect before entering to squid. > >> > > > >Pardon? all HTTP request and reply are processed in some fashion by Squid. > > > >What are you attempting to do? with what squid release? and how have you > >tried so far? > > > >Amos > > > -- > Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE4 or 3.0.STABLE8 -- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
