On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Amos Jeffries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Is it true that there are problems with Cache_dir more than 10GB? > > No. I have larger caches here. Some others have caches in the TB range. > > Only "cache_dir coss" specifically are known to have maximum size issues > due to the format design. And not handle large files. > > There are some related issues known; > > You might need Squid built with --enable-large-files to get a 64-bit > build if you intend to pass entire DVDs through Squid.
So, if this options are ok in my binare is ok to handle large files? > > Squid-2 has issues with handling of very large individual files being > somewhat slow. > > >> >> Many people talk about it, but I dont found any information in Squid >> website. May be I didnt looking for right! >> >> So, it is true, will be a big problem, because with big hd, more than >> 100GB, all to make cache. We will have problem with speed of write and >> read in one HD. > > AUFS on Linux, or DiskD on *BSD should have no problem with that size. > Just make sure there is enough RAM in use for a mem-cache and the file > indexes. Why AUFS on Linux and DiskD on *BSD? What is the diference in those System Operations? > > Amos > > -- Rafael Gomes Consultor em TI Embaixador Fedora LPIC-1 (71) 8709-1289
