Just a follow-up, Squid3 didn't work as expected for me, so I tried recompiling 2.6-STABLE22 with the MAX_URL changed to 8192.
It's working great so far and have moved it into production with no issues. - Gregori -----Original Message----- From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:34 AM To: Gregori Parker Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squid-users] url length limit > It has been tried at 8192 with no sign of trouble in Squid-3. > If your URL get much large than that, we really do need it checked up as > > high as 128KB so feel free to build with larger values, just please > report back how it goes (particularly if good news). > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 > > I'd suggest experimenting with squid 3.1.0.1 to see if its usable in > your setup. The URL limits have been raised to 8KB already and diskless > operation is much more polished and native. > > > As for logging the URI, most things in squid are dropped when they are > found to overflow the buffers like that. The details may be logged to > cache.log when debug_options is set to the right section and level. I'm > not sure right now which one is relevant to 2.6 though, there are a few > available. > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/DebugSections > > > Amos
