On 21.03.2010 01:18, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Arthur Titeica wrote: >> I've seen the other thread regarding this subject and I must admit this >> is too technical for me to express an opinion about the situation. >> >> I just wanted to mention that today I tested both 'squid-3.1.0.18' and >> 'squid-3.1.0.18-20100320' in a reverse proxy setup and the client >> receives '417 Expectation failed' where all the previous 3.1.x worked >> just fine. >> >> In fact I just installed back the .17 version to fix this issue. >> > > Your client agent (web browser?) is pretending to be HTTP/1.1 capable > and yet cannot handle one of the most simple HTTP/1.1 error responses.
No, it's not a browser. > Please report the bug to the authors of that software. > Please also let the rest of us know what software this is. I just reported it to them and wait to see what they have to say. It's not something of public interest, it's just software used internally in my company. > The problem: > 417 is the response Squid and other HTTP/1.1-aware proxies are required > to use to tell HTTP/1.1 clients the request it has made is possible but > needs to be tried again using an HTTP/1.0-compatible request. It WILL be > passing over an HTTP/1.0-only section of network. > > Workaround: > When built with --enable-http-violations Squid 3.1 has the > ignore_expect_100 configuration option for ignoring these clients requests. > It will result in either a passable but very, very slow start to some > types of requests. Or in a timeout error while it waits for a > non-existent OKAY response. Depending on how broken the client software is. OK, thanks. I'll make some tests and see.
