Is it ok if i set digest_generation to off? we are not using any cache peers ...
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Mr. Issa(*) <xnix...@gmail.com> wrote: > /dev/sdc1 1.8T 339G 1.4T 20% /cache1 > /dev/sdd1 1.8T 333G 1.4T 20% /cache2 > > pr0xySRV:~# more /etc/squid/squid.conf |grep cache_swap_high ; more > /etc/squid/squid.conf |grep cache_swap_low > cache_swap_high 95 > cache_swap_low 94 > > > it didnt even reach 60% of its usage.... This appeared after upgrading > from Stable7 to Stable9 > > So what could be the reason? > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote: >> Mr. Issa(*) wrote: >>> >>> Dear mates, I hope you enjoy your weekend... :) >>> >>> I did compile/install Squid2.7Stable9 and i noticed something >>> >>> /dev/sdc1 1.8T 355G 1.4T 21% /cache1 >>> /dev/sdd1 1.8T 352G 1.4T 21% /cache2 >>> the /cache1 & cache2 dirs where 370G each.. suddenly they are >>> decreasing and the servers load is approximately high.... What could >>> cause that? >> >> Well, I guess the server load is caused by all the work needed to remove the >> items from cache. >> >> Items being removed from cache wholesale like this is usually caused by one >> of the garbage collection limits being reached. >> cache_swap_high / cache_swap_low >> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/cache_swap_high/ >> >> NP: the large cache disclaimer applies to anyone with around 10GB or more of >> cached data. >> >> Amos >> -- >> Please be using >> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE8 or 3.0.STABLE25 >> Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.18 >> >