On 8/8/2012 6:49 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
Hello,
since I changed the configuration
memory usage is growing slowy.
Now squid is using 17% of 4GB
Eliezer, I am not sure to understand. But I am using two VM,
active/passive setup with a corosync VIP.
I remembered someone talking here about a VM that was replicated and
caused squid to leak memory.
so I asked if it's a VM that was cloned or not to verify it.
for me it still odd that a cloned VM will cause such a thing so I will
just say it's seems like a bogus alarm set by someone by false assumption.
just curios about this cluster setup you have there:
can you give some more details about it? (email me directly)
I am working on a cluster setup of squid tproxy balanced on a routing level.
Thanks,
Elizer
I will consider upgrading one member of the cluster to 3.1.20 (squeeze
packages). DO you think this will sole the issue ?
Regards,
On 8 August 2012 05:30, Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
On 08.08.2012 02:35, Simon Roscic wrote:
<SNIP>
>
I think this is probably:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3605
Can you start with the cachemgr memory usage report and confirm whether the
same FwdServer excessive memory usage is seen?
Amos
--
Eliezer Croitoru
https://www1.ngtech.co.il
IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations
eliezer <at> ngtech.co.il
