On 11/7/2012 6:06 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
The primary difference that I see is on the Cisco configuration. I reconfigured my test router to match the configuration in your example (modifying 10.80.3.0/24 to match my testing subnet), but packets weren't being redirected to the cache at all - no hits showing on the access-list.When I moved the statements: ip wccp 80 redirect out ip wccp 90 redirect in from the interface facing the clients to be cached, to the interface facing the internet, it started redirecting clients to the cache and everything now (appears!) to be working properly as a transparent tproxy cache!
Interestingly, when I put this in to production, I had to put the "ip wccp..." statements above on the LAN interface, rather than the WAN interface; in my testing I had to put it on the WAN interface.
Just following up for the sake of people finding this thread in a google search later....
-- ----------------------------------------------- - Nick Bright - - Vice President of Technology - - Valnet -=- We Connect You -=- - - Tel 888-332-1616 x 315 / Fax 620-331-0789 - - Web http://www.valnet.net/ - ----------------------------------------------- - Are your files safe? - - Valnet Vault - Secure Cloud Backup - - More information & 30 day free trial at - - http://www.valnet.net/services/valnet-vault - -----------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
