* Amos Jeffries <squ...@treenet.co.nz>: > On 22/01/2013 2:00 a.m., babajaga wrote: > >>Rock and COSS storage types however are far more optimized for speed, > >using both disk and RAM storage in ther normal "disk" configuration. < > > > >Amos, > > > >haven't you been a little bit too "generous" in your comments, especially > >this referred one ? > > I don't think so. They *have* been optimized for speed and are > measurably so. > I made no comment about bug-free state in any of the disk I/O modues. > Just about speed versus a RAM disk.
"Of course it doesn't work, but look how fast it is" (just a little joke, no offense meant) Anyway, maybe I'll try those in a new setup (new machines are upcoming). -- Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin ralf.hildebra...@charite.de Campus Benjamin Franklin http://www.charite.de Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT, Abt. Netzwerk fon: +49-30-450.570.155
