On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:28:20AM +0800, csn233 wrote: > > Has anyone experienced this? > > SG has numerous problems which caused it not to do what it's supposed > to, including that "emergency" mode thing. Here are some things to > consider: > > 1) a BIG blacklist is overhyped - when I had a good look at our > requirements, there was only a small percentage of those websites we > actually wanted to block, the rest were either squatting websites or > non-existent, or not relevant. Squid could blacklist (eg ACL DENY) > those websites natively with a minimum of fuss. > 2) SG has not been updated for 4 or 5 years, if that's your latest > version, you are still out of date. More to the point, you will not > find much help now. or anyone to fix it even if you could prove it's a > bug. > 3) It has some quirks in how it handles hosts/domains in the > blacklist, which may not be how you think it is. > > I didn't bother spending any more time on it.
ufdbGuard is a more powerful substitute of squidGuard. Has regular updates and even free support. Marcus
