Thanks Michael.

I figured it out. I had also added a iplist to the chat definitions, I
entered them with CIDR notation, which I thought SG could handle. I have
not had a chance to see what I did wrong there yet, but once I removed
the iplist definitions from the chat definitions things started working
as it expected. All I can figure is the faulty iplist made SG skip over
the chat definitions.

Thanks for your advice though.

Cheers,

Stewart

On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 23:23, Michael Wray wrote:
> if the domain is broken down into machine names anywhere in the domains
> list, (i.e. somewhere in the same override list you have yahoo.com and
> msgs.yahoo.com) then it expects you to specify each group of machine names.
> (i.e. it'll match any URL with msgs.yahoo.com in it..but ONLY
> yahoo.com/whatever for yahoo.com....not messenger.yahoo.com, chat.yahoo.com)
> if that's what you really want to match, be sure that ONLY yahoo.com is in
> the domain lists...any other specifics should go in the URL list. (i.e.
> specific blocks.)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stewart James
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 1:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: acl evaluation
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am trying to get something that I thought should work working :)
> (arent we all)
> 
> I have a rule something like:
> pass !anonmail !chat exceptions !proxy !mail !gambling !porn !warez
> !labs all
> 
> Now, here is what is blowing up on me. One of the vlacklists I get list
> yahoo.com as an mail site. I simply throw yahoo.com into the exceptions
> domain list, and now it is allowed.
> 
> The problem. I have msg.yahoo.com (and shttp.msg.yahoo.com) in my chat
> domains, which as you can see is before the exceptions list, now I
> thought first match won, so in my logic the shttp.msg.yahoo.com is
> should now be hit before the yahoo.com exception in matched.
> 
> What is even stranger is that the anonmailer dfomains list includes
> mail.yahoo.com, and this works fine. Can anyone think of any gotchas I
> might be overlooking, this is really starting to give me a nice little
> headache.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stewart James
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to