> William R. Mussatto said: > >>> Well, based on that answer... >>> >>> Then the top message should not have "Delete and Next" and "Next" >>> selectable. >>> >>> Try it and you will see that "Delete and Next" is selectable for the >>> top message in the list. >>> >>> something is wrong. im telling ya! >> >> Shouldn't the software replicate the behavior of the "stable" release? >> If there is nothing "before" the message in the list as currently >> sorted then "Previous" and "Delete and Previous" should not be links. >> If there is nothing "after" the message in the list as currently >> sorted then "Next" and "Delete and Next" should not be links. >> >>> SqM said: >>> >>>>> But something is still backwards with it. Try selecting the top >>>>> message in a folder. Notice the "Delete & Next" and "Next" buttons >>>>> are only selectable. >>>>> >>>>> If you select "Delete & Next" on the next message only the "Delete >>>>> & Previous" button is selectable. >>>>> >>>>> BUT, if you select the "NEXT" button (on the top message), then the >>>>> "Next" button and the "Delete & Next" button are available. >>>>> >>>>> Something is backwards. >>>> >>>> As i understand according to an earlier answer i got on >>>> this list this is the way it is designed to be..;-) >>>> >>>> Depending on the sort order you select a message arrived later in >>>> your message box could either be selected with "next" or >>>> "previous". >>>> >>>> As i understand "previous" is always a message "above" in the >>>> message list. "next" is always the message under the current message >>>> in the message list. It does not have anything with the more logical >>>> "next" in either the sort order or arrival order. >>>> >>>> >>>> /SqM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I didn't try it really at the time I wrote this but actually, it >>>>>> IS working on my site and better than before! No errors or >>>>>> anything for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers! >>>>>> >> >> >> William R. Mussatto, Senior Systems Engineer >> Ph. 909-920-9154 ext. 27 >> FAX. 909-608-7061 >> >> >> >> > Are you set to sort by date or by thread? I think the problem only > occurs when sorting by thread. > Ah yes that's correct so I wouldn't see the problem. Am on uw-imap and this version at least does not do server side sorting and I've disallowed thread sort because of timeouts..
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
