Does anyone know why my CPU levels are getting high after like 18 hours of
SM being accesses continutally?
I'm running 1.2 (we haven't upgraded to 1.4 because of an IMAP issue.. but
I think that's resolved so we'll be upgrading shortly... in the meantime
however)...
I don't recall this happening before but it will run very low on the CPU
for a while and then jump up and just stay there..

TOP OUTPUT:

  7:15am  up 6 days,  9:29,  1 user,  load average: 1.66, 1.41, 1.30
94 processes: 90 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states: 76.3% user,  5.4% system,  0.0% nice, 17.1% idle
CPU1 states: 62.0% user,  4.1% system,  0.0% nice, 33.2% idle
Mem:  1160004K av, 1143408K used,   16596K free,       0K shrd,  226016K buff
Swap:  779144K av,   23300K used,  755844K free                  748996K
cached

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
 8165 nobody    17   0  6020  536   228 R    97.7  0.0 759:37 httpd
25037 nobody     9   0  5820 5776  1896 S     7.5  0.4   0:00 httpd
24849 nobody     9   0  5228 5188  1912 S     5.9  0.4   0:01 httpd
24881 nobody     9   0  5796 5756  1904 S     5.3  0.4   0:01 httpd
16382 nobody     9   0  6328 6292  1972 S     4.1  0.5   0:40 httpd
24759 nobody     9   0  6212 6176  1924 S     4.1  0.5   0:02 httpd
24905 nobody     9   0  4988 4952  1900 S     3.7  0.4   0:01 httpd
25032 nobody     9   0  5120 5068  1848 S     3.7  0.4   0:00 httpd
    6 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    2.1  0.0 178:01 kscand
19584 nobody     9   0  6016 5980  1972 S     1.7  0.5   0:26 httpd

It seems like it's the parent apache proccess that is sucking up the CPU..
the children don't seem to... any ideas?

~ Matt




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to