Le jeu 08/01/2004 Ã 01:42, Douglas Campbell a Ãcrit : > I also noticed this a few days ago. I am using squirrelmail 1.4.2-1, downloaded > from squirrelmail.org site; I am > running it under RedHat 8.0 with all patches applied. The previous version of > squirrelmail was deleted prior to > installing this one. > > Here is a sample directory listing, in response to someone's post in reply to the > above. It appears that the > directories are the only things affected in my case. I installed it as root; should > I change ownership?
Bleh. It's a bug in our build system. Our build directory on beta.linux.duke.edu is setuid, so everything else that's created during build ends up being g+s as well. It's not dangerous or anything in the security sense -- g+s on directory bits just means that new files created in that directory will be have the group owner by default the one of the directory they are created in. Since the ownership is root:root, it's a useless setting anyway. I'll see if I can rebuild the RPM without this problem, but it shouldn't affect anyone in any way. Regards, -- Konstantin Riabitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
