I have a question about the GPL and squirrelmail. We as a company have been using squirrelmail for some time now and it has truly changed the way our remote users go about email. Thanks to all.
About a month ago I came across a university using squirrelmail for one of their departments. They had renamed the software and gave no mention of squirrelmail - yet it was obvious it was. My question is: Is it a violation of the GPL when a group renames (as in University Mail 2.0) and claims squirrelmail as their own and gives no mention of the original source? I've always been under the impression that one must at least give mention of the project itself so that others can know. Is this true, or am I way off base here. To me there just seemed something wrong with what they are doing. Maybe you the developers don't care however. What does everybody think about this? Is this group just claiming this software as their own by simply renaming it and seemingly taking credit? Any feedback welcome. /David ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
