> I have not experienced any performance problems with that exact setup. I would say having 36942 email accounts is a pretty good pool to gather data from. I've used a similar setup with >50,000 accounts as well. It sounds to me that you may have had some configuration or hardware issue that you didn't discover. As far as using a single imapd, you're awfully trusting that you won't have any problems IMHO. Lack of redundancy can become very obvious when you have a failure.
Could be our NFS settings. nfsd maxed out the 100mbit link regularly and of course, NFS over UDP doesn't like such environments. It was a nasty experience. >> to the MX, where remote MTA's will stop using downed servers >> automatically. > > He wasn't asking about MTA's but about imap/http load balancing via DNS RR. It will work just fine given the caveat above. I believe he was talking about SMTP as well. John -- John Madden UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech State College [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id281&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [email protected] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
