Johannes Egger wrote: >>> ==> SquirrelMail (SM) patch forum <==
> Personally I'd also rather use official code, and I'm sure a lot of > other users feel the same. New users might get confused by references to > other sites, and might not know what it entails to "risk" using > third-party patches that may or may not do what they intend. > > I'd rather wait for the author of the plugin to commit changes I agree with you. I'd rather participate in the established groups, and with authors, to provide ideas and suggest changes. I'd rather use the established system so that new versions are distributed via the official site. This provides better opportunity for changes to be well tested and any glitches to be reported, discussed and remedied. I have no interest in some unofficial forum with quick hacks that aren't well tested, and possibly written by authors who can't be bothered to follow SM guidelines. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting Guidelines: http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/MailingListPostingGuidelines List Address: [email protected] List Archives: http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
