On Mon, August 17, 2015 22:17, jimmy cho wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the reply, > > Yes squirrelmail account is [email protected] > <[email protected]> > > logged in as the user sales. the email is from the sender > [email protected] . The mail header is > > > Return-Path: <[email protected]> ... > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > > > Problem is when reply-all is selected, the sender > > [email protected] > > is not listed in the To: field only the cc addresses. The email > was > sent and the sender never got the reply because the user did not spot > the > missing [email protected] address. I agreed the email header is > defective because of the erroneous Reply-To: . But the From: field > entry [email protected] should be in the To: field in the reply email > compose page. > > rgds > > Jimmy > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Paul Lesniewski <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 8/17/15, jimmy cho <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > squirrelmail *Stable version snapshots* *(1.4.23-svn)* >> > squirrelmail-20150817_0200-SVN.stable.tar.gz >> > >> > Centos 7 >> > php 5.4 >> > postfix 2.10 >> > dovecot-2.2.10 >> > >> > The Sender is [email protected] >> >> Please send full headers. "Sender" without more context is ambiguous. >> >> > cc list is " tanker" <[email protected]>, >> > <[email protected]>, >> > "Alk Rt" <[email protected]>, >> > "Chine Kh" <[email protected]> >> > Email is addressed to [email protected] >> > >> > When the reply all selection is made >> > >> > The To: field is populated with >> > >> > "tanker" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, >> "Alk >> Rt" >> > <[email protected]>, >> > "Chine Kh" <[email protected]> >> > >> > which are the CC adddresses in the email. >> > >> > The sender [email protected] is not in the To: field. >> > >> > >> > One issue seem in the email header is the Reply-To is set with >> > [email protected]. When another webmail client is used, the sender >> email >> > is place in the To: field. >> >> Then perhaps your bug report should go to the other webmail system >> that does not respect the Reply-To header. Sounds like SquirrelMail >> is doing exactly what it should, at least guessing without seeing all >> the details. >> >> > When the squirrelmail 1.4.22 version is used, the >> [email protected] >> > is place in the To: field >> >> So I'll guess that the account you're logged into is >> [email protected] (but it's your job to tell me things like that). >> If that's the case, you can look at the setting: Options==>Display >> Preferences==>Include Me in CC when I Reply All >> >> > and the cc addresses are placed in the CC: >> > filed. The sender address [email protected] cannot be found. >> >> See above. >> >> -- >> Paul Lesniewski >> SquirrelMail Team >> Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail! >> http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php
Reply-TO: exists explicitly to force replies to go to that address. Emails generated from Web Forms have to use the web user as the FROM address to pass through anti-spam filters, but when the person receiving the email replies they expect the mail to go back to the person who filled out the form not the computer. Any other result causes problems. <RANT>They had to invent a special header 'X-Sender:' to deal with the defective programs which ignore the Reply-To field in favor of the FROM field.</RANT> ------ William R. Mussatto Systems Engineer http://www.csz.com 909-920-9154 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- squirrelmail-users mailing list Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines List address: [email protected] List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
