I'd be more than happy to supply what I've learned by installing various packages in the last 2 1/2 weeks (still fresh in my mind). This includes Qmail (with assorted patches), vpopmail, qmailanalog, Qmailadmin, and Sqwebmail. Let me know if you'd could use my help.
Don .-----Original Message----- .From: CS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] .Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:34 PM .To: Andy Bradford .Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sqwebmail .Subject: Re: A question --- was - Is this the correct mailing list?? . . .It's not so much frightful, but think back to when you first installed .it... . .Not being a qmail user beforehand, I had to work in no less than 4 patches .to make qmail "modern"... SSL, Auth, tarpitting and bouncecontrol. Maybe .others :) . .And then you've got the various inter7 and courier packages. All in all, .there's really quite a period of time where you've got to get familiar .with 4 or 5 complex pieces of software at once and understand how they .interact with each other. . .I'm about to make the move to the latest vpopmail, sqwebmail, and .courier-imap. I need to document better this time. . .Is there anyone who would be interested in working on a pop-toaster .mega-faq? The thing I've found lacking is not the individual docs .themselves, but something that covers the "big picture" better. . .CS . .On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Andy Bradford wrote: . .> Thus said "Systems Administrator" on Thu, 08 Nov 2001 13:40:28 MST: .> .> > The documentation is frightful. I guess that's why there's mailing .> > lists, huh? .> .> Not to start a flame war or anything, but I think the documentation is .> actually quite decent compared to some I have seen. Let's give credit .> where credit is due. ;-) .> .> Andy .> -- .> GnuPG ID 0xA63888C9 (D2DA 68C9 BB2B 26B4 8204 2219 A43E F450 A638 88C9) .> [-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------] .> 10:01pm up 47 days, 5:57, 5 users, load average: 1.51, 1.45, 1.44 .> .> .> . .
