I would agree its a connection reuse issue, #1107 is probably a more relevant 
discussion to have.

As an experiment I tried a modified version of tcp_main.c with the connection 
lookup modified to not return an existing connection and the expected behaviour 
was observed. 

Thinking the further the ideal solution from my point of view would be a pair 
of config values, one to enable a enhanced matching mechanism, and a 
complementary value list of ips which need to be outbound sni aware and takes 
the tls profile into account when a configured ip is matched as the 
destination.  Unfortunately this would be non trivial as correct me if I'm 
wrong but the tls profile is attached after the connection is created so a 
chicken and egg problem? I agree this isnt vast majority use case territory but 
would be invaluable for offering hosted services and allows me to keep the rest 
of the architecture and network config the same.  As surely an outbound 
connection with a different servername specified should be treated as distinct 
connections even if the destination is the same? 

The issue I have with aliases is that I would swap the admin burden of adding 
sans to the ssl and doing a tls.reload to having to restart the service, and 
increase the number of open ports at the edge, basically its not scalable 
enough, I can just about cope with slow tls reload when you have more than one 
cert loaded (trivial load test with 30 certs took over 60 secs to reload) The 
whole impetus for trying to use sni with kamailio would be offer a scalable, 
automatable provisioning for direct routing customers, which doesn't have a 
restriction on number of sans defined on the cert (think simplicity of adding a 
vhost in nginx).  Currently provisioning can be done live by expanding a cert, 
updating the dispatcher with new entries and reloading tls and dispatcher with 
kamcmd.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2760#issuecomment-858396771
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to