I am bit lost on how the code execution flow works for KEMI. My understanding
was that all KEMI methods are exported by `sr_kemi_t` structure array, which
specifies exported function names, their internal implementation function name
and its arguments either as string `SR_KEMIP_STR` or integer `SR_KEMIP_INT`.
Each exported function (e.g. `cr_route`) calls internal implementation function
(e.g. `ki_cr_route5`), which then checks arguments and then either do the
actual implementation or calls up a wrapper function (e.g. `w_cr_do_route`)
which does some formatting on input arguments (e.g. `cr_route_fixup`) and then
pass it to an existing implementation (e.g. `cr_do_route`). The output
arguments control flow is in the opposite direction. Also since there is no
free fixup in existing implementation of `cmd_export_t`, so I didn't created or
called-in any for KEMI.
```
static cmd_export_t cmds[]={
{"cr_user_carrier", (cmd_function)cr_load_user_carrier, 3,
cr_load_user_carrier_fixup, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE },
{"cr_route", (cmd_function)cr_route5, 5,
cr_route_fixup, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE },
{"cr_route", (cmd_function)cr_route, 6,
cr_route_fixup, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE },
{"cr_nofallback_route",(cmd_function)cr_nofallback_route5, 5,
cr_route_fixup, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE },
{"cr_nofallback_route",(cmd_function)cr_nofallback_route, 6,
cr_route_fixup, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE },
{"cr_next_domain", (cmd_function)cr_load_next_domain, 6,
cr_load_next_domain_fixup, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE | FAILURE_ROUTE },
{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
};
```
On the python side, my example just shows that whatever we pass as argument
(whether `$fU` or `KSR.kx.get_fuser()` or `"any-string-value"`), the module
function will accept and take care of it (i.e. fetch the actual string value
internally), this is already tested in my lab environment.
However, @miconda has suggested the completely different approach. Can you
please point me to any existing howto or explain a bit more on how to write
KEMI implementation of an existing module function? The example you provide at,
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/posops/posops_mod.c#L170-L224
is very confusing and does not give any hints on how the flow actually works.
Thank you.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3247#issuecomment-1262845427
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3247/c1262845...@github.com>_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
sr-dev@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
