Erratum: It **is** inherited - I had oberwritten the TCP_USER_TIMEOUT in
handle_new_connect() with a missing TICKS_TO_S() - so it was a too high value
(ticks instead of seconds).
Tried again in tcp_init() on the listening socket:
```diff
--- a/src/core/tcp_main.c
+++ b/src/core/tcp_main.c
@@ -3172,6 +3172,22 @@ int tcp_init(struct socket_info *sock_info)
}
#endif
init_sock_keepalive(sock_info->socket);
+
+
+ if ((optval = TICKS_TO_S(cfg_get(tcp, tcp_cfg, send_timeout)))) {
+ optval *= 1000;
+ if(setsockopt(sock_info->socket, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT,
&optval,
+ sizeof(optval))
+ < 0) {
+ LM_WARN("failed to set TCP_USER_TIMEOUT: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
+ } else {
+ LM_INFO("Set TCP_USER_TIMEOUT=%d ms\n", optval);
+ }
+ }
+
+
+
if(bind(sock_info->socket, &addr->s, sockaddru_len(*addr)) == -1) {
LM_ERR("bind(%x, %p, %d) on %s:%d : %s\n", sock_info->socket,
&addr->s,
(unsigned)sockaddru_len(*addr),
sock_info->address_str.s,
```
=> working, too.
What is your opinion? Should it be in tcp_init() or in handle_new_connect()?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3443#issuecomment-1654481936
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3443/1654481...@github.com>_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
