@devopsec: at the end you get more or less to a specific order of selecting the
addresses to route to. For example, with two addresses one 99 and the other 1,
the one with weight 1 is going to be placed the 2nd (or 1st depending on the
initial order). If weights are 90 and 10, it should end up like `1st, 2nd, 1st,
1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, 2nd, 1st, 1st...`. For calls of same
type (e.g., codecs, audio/video) and duration, could bring some benefits, but
for calls of random type and duration the random ordering proved to give pretty
good load of resources.
With the above remarks, considering that random ordering was done on purpose at
the time of implementation, I don't consider this PR a bug fix, but a different
distribution algorithm (for example it can be called percentage ordered
distribution).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3531#issuecomment-1668984420
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3531/c1668984...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe send an email to sr-dev-le...@lists.kamailio.org
