On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Juha Heinanen <j...@tutpro.com> wrote: > sip-router writes: > > > I remember some discussions about how to handle string versus integer > > AVPs, but I don't remember all the details. > > I prefer to use int AVPs (my understanding - in kamailio 1.5 - was > > that int AVPs were faster then str AVPs). > > there was some discussion about this earlier and jan said that there is > not much speed difference between int or string named avps. int named > avps are still supported in sr. i too use some int named avp names, but > for other than performance reasons.
Having an int AVP also allows for step by step incrementation (which is not possible with string AVPs). This is one of the reasons that I'm using AVPs. And maybe because I'm old school? :) -ovidiu _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
