On 4/12/10 1:28 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Henning Westerholt writes:
> hm, i'd opt to keep the 408 here. What about setting a flag if you
> received a provisional response in reply_route, and then check this
> in your failure_route when you process the 408? We do it this way,
> and did not found any problems so far. I think Juha also proposed
> something like this earlier.
yes, that is what i proposed and have been using myself for years. i
don't see any need to make changes in tm for this.
in 3.0 there are some extra functions that may help figuring out the
type of timeout - t_branch_timeout() and t_branch_replied():
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#t_branch_timeout
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
http://twitter.com/miconda *
http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
