Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > Well, the master branch doesn't compile, pv module throws errors.
thanks for reporting. should be fixed now. > Also, the modules in modules_s have to be made to compile for the > moment, otherwise master branch compilation fails anyhow. They may be > removed, but that will still take time, it will not happen in the next > hours. modules_s modules using append_branch should be now ok too. > It is no really need to replace them (the old ones). You can add a new > function returning the pointer to the next branch and use it. For long > term, I think the one with the pointer is easier to maintain whenever we > need to add new members in the structure, I would go for that. > > However, the old ones can be kept, so not much code is affected, > probably not all places where get_branch/next_branch are used need the > instance/reg-id. ok, i'll look into it tomorrow. -- juha _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev