Thanks for this contribution, I think the result shows better what happens with
the replies handled by tm.
The patch can be merged. But afterwards, because we are already having
different names and change the overall counting for those replies, I think is
better to go to a more coherent naming. So, if you have time, after merging,
maybe you can change the names.
I propose to use 'rpl_' prefix to suggest is about replies, so:
```
tmx:rpl_received - received replies
tmx:rpl_absorbed - absorbed replies (I think it suggests already they were
received, in order to be absorbed)
tmx:rpl_generated - locally generated replies
tmx:rpl_relayed - relayed replies (I think 'relay' would be suggestive enough
for 'received and sent out'
tmx:rpl_sent - all replies that were sent out (local and received)
```
If anyone has better suggestions for names, I welcome other proposals. One of
the goals should be trying to keep the names rather short.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/442#issuecomment-164445449
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
