Hi Daniel,

This issue might be related to #679 and #752. 

On a "A endpoint" --- Kamailio ---- "B endpoint" scenario with 
track_cseq_updates enabled, I am having this issue:

- **A** sends INVITE with CSeq 101, **Kamailio** forwards it and gets 407 from 
**B**.

- **Kamailio** makes the SIP Auth with CSeq 102 using _uac_auth_.

- **A** sends a within-dialog transaction with Cseq 102.

- **Kamailio** does not mangle the Cseq (although it adds P-K-CSeq-Refresh: 103 
header).

- **B** sends 200 OK with Cseq 102.

- **Kamailio** mangles it and forwards it to **A** with Cseq 101 (that doesn't 
match the expected CSeq).


I have tested both in master branch (commit d150d5a) and 4.4 branch (commit 
5a21952).

I send you a pcap to your gmail account so that you can see what I mean :)

Thank you and tell me please if you need more testing!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/787
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to