If I remember well this header never becomes an proposed standard (i might be wrong) and for these cases as most popular the draft most implemented.
Regards, On Nov 1, 2016 9:26 PM, "Björn Bylander" <notificati...@github.com> wrote: > Hmm, isn't RFC 5806 (March 2010) older than RFC 6044 (October 2010)? Given > that, I fail to see how 5806 can be a replacement? RFC 6044 is obsoleted by > RFC 7544 however (August 2015) which also says that comma separated > diversions are allowed. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/841#issuecomment-257684840>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZbDUFnVB1KMKp_K4sfefOLr0cc4Xks5q56BogaJpZM4KmL3j> > . > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev > >
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
