when using the **sanity** module, with the **SANITY_CHECK_DIGEST** check
enabled, if a message contains an "Authorization" header with a different
scheme than "digest", the message is considered as invalid, although being
perfectly valid.
In your opinion, should the module be modified to not fail when the scheme is
different than "digest", or should a new flag (e.g.
**SANITY_CHECK_AUTHORIZATION**) be introduced, validating the digest parameters
if the scheme is digest and returning success otherwise, to keep the old flag
working exactly as it is now?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/892
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
