Hi Folks,

We faced a deadlock caused by acquiring the same lock twice in
src/modules/dmq_usrloc/usrloc_sync.c

dmq_ul.lock_udomain(_d, &aor);
>> lock_get(_d->table[sl].lock);
get_urecord_by_ruid
>> lock_ulslot(_d, sl);
>>>> lock_get(_d->table[i].lock);

The attached fix will not lock until get_urecord_by_ruid as returned.


Regards
Julien
diff --git a/src/modules/dmq_usrloc/usrloc_sync.c b/src/modules/dmq_usrloc/usrloc_sync.c
index 9b966d5..551f77a 100644
--- a/src/modules/dmq_usrloc/usrloc_sync.c
+++ b/src/modules/dmq_usrloc/usrloc_sync.c
@@ -62,8 +62,6 @@ static int add_contact(str aor, ucontact_info_t* ci)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	dmq_ul.lock_udomain(_d, &aor);
-
 	LM_DBG("aor: %.*s\n", aor.len, aor.s);
 	LM_DBG("ci->ruid: %.*s\n", ci->ruid.len, ci->ruid.s);
 	LM_DBG("aorhash: %i\n", dmq_ul.get_aorhash(&aor));
@@ -81,6 +79,7 @@ static int add_contact(str aor, ucontact_info_t* ci)
 			return 0;
 		}
 	}
+	dmq_ul.lock_udomain(_d, &aor);
 	res = dmq_ul.get_urecord(_d, &aor, &r);
 	if (res < 0) {
 		LM_ERR("failed to retrieve record from usrloc\n");
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev

Reply via email to