Thinking it better, wouldn't moving the flag reset at the end of t_continue make the check in t_reply useless? I have to admit that I don't fully understand that check anyway :)
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Federico Cabiddu <notificati...@github.com> wrote: > You're right, I'll try this 2nd approach. > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < > notificati...@github.com> wrote: > > > Unless you think it should be better to be reset when t_continue() is > > finished instead of inside t_suspend(), you can merge it. > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276049199>, > > or mute the thread > > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADip4- > uUCfyyOtIztbsfOXue3BnqzQh_ks5rXdVHgaJpZM4LwvBV> > > . > > > > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/955#issuecomment-276049555>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZYAsvBRJ6KyaWuVm-Jg6pmA9CZoIks5rXdXKgaJpZM4LwvBV> > . > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev > >
_______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
