I am fine to increase the size. The version number should not be increased, it is not a change that breaks any query and c code should have checks/or allocations based on the size. Should be also ok to backport.
Cheers, Daniel On 16/02/2017 04:48, Juha Heinanen wrote: > I would need larger dialplan table repl_exp field. Its size is currently 64 > chars: > > <column id="repl_exp"> > <name>repl_exp</name> > <type>string</type> > <size>64</size> > <description>Replacement expresion (sed like).</description> > </column> > > Would it be OK to increase its size to 256 chars? If so, should table > version number be also increased? > > -- Juha > > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe) and Mar 20-22 (USA) - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev