Hi 
You said that only thing changed is the Provider chanded their end.
Have you compared the previous signaling to the current ?
Previous I mean before provider change their switch.
Could there be some difference and that causes this error.

Tomi

On 21 Dec 2017, at 23.01, Jean Cérien <cerien.j...@gmail.com> wrote:


Hello
I am using kamailio 5.0.2, on a debian 9 system.

Everything was running fine, until one of our voip provider changed his switch. 
Our kamailio is relaying between several voip providers and several asterisk 
(only the signalisation, no rtp).

When we get an invite from this new switch, we select an asterisk and relay it 
correctly to this box. However, the OK is relayed back. But when the voip 
providers sends an ACK for this OK, the t_relay function does not return at 
all, it just dies with no action and no error.

Here is the snippet from route(relay)

        xlog("L_INFO","route(relay)  @@ $rm - Source: $si:$sp, fu:$fu, 
tu:$tu\n" );
        $var(restrelay)=t_relay();
        xlog("L_INFO","route(relay)  @@ $rm - t_relay result: $var(restrelay)" 
);
        if (!$var(restrelay)) {

When processing the initial invite, I do get both INFO messages. When the ACK 
is processed, I only get one INFO message, and no ACK is relayed - so it seems 
execution dies in the t_relay

What could be wrong ???

J.

Details of the ACK:

ACK sip:dialednumber@kamailioIP:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP VOIPPROVIDERIP:5060;branch=z9hG4bKjq16fi00d85uee181ic0.1
To: <sip:kamailioIP:5060>;tag=as7f10ed48
From: 
<sip:sourcenum...@orange-multimedia.fr>;tag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000
Call-ID: SD8u3ob01-688d41f5e2164ceeafe76f40b82b3f97-v300g00030
CSeq: 1 ACK
Max-Forwards: 66
Content-Length: 0
Route: 
<sip:kamailioIP;lr=on;ftag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000;did=a0b.49d>



(should you have enough width; the diagram will look ok)

                   VOIP PROVIDER               KAMAILIO                       
ASTERISK
  21:38:54.685149   │ ──────────────────────────> │                             
│   
▒       +0.000451   │  100 trying -- your call is │                             
│   
▒ 21:38:54.685600   │ <────────────────────────── │                             
│   
▒       +0.000084   │                             │        INVITE (SDP)         
│  
▒ 21:38:54.685684   │                             │ ──────────────────────────> 
│  
▒       +0.000831   │                             │         100 Trying          
│  
▒ 21:38:54.686515   │                             │ <────────────────────────── 
│  
▒       +0.000471   │                             │        200 OK (SDP)         
│  
▒ 21:38:54.686986   │                             │ <────────────────────────── 
│  
▒       +0.000394   │        200 OK (SDP)         │                             
│   
▒ 21:38:54.687380   │ <────────────────────────── │                             
│   
▒       +0.038694   │             ACK             │                             
│   
▒ 21:38:54.726074   │ ──────────────────────────> │                             
│   
▒       +0.060155   │                             │        200 OK (SDP)         
│  
▒ 21:38:54.786229   │                             │ <<<──────────────────────── 
│  
▒       +0.000138   │        200 OK (SDP)         │                             
│   
▒ 21:38:54.786367   │ <<<──────────────────────── │                             
│   
▒       +0.005721   │             ACK             │                             
│ 


_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Reply via email to