Hello Alex, Thank you for the clarification. Now I understand this behavior.
пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 22:07 Alex Balashov <abalas...@evaristesys.com> пише: > Branches are a creature of transactions. It follows that “branch flags” > are transaction-persistent flags at the branch level, rather than scoped to > the transaction as a whole. > > ACKs constitute a separate transaction. > > — > Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors. > > On May 24, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Sergiu Pojoga <pojo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Then.. I don't know, lol > > But the fact that ACKs belong or not to even different transactions > (depending on whether positive or negative reply) must be playing a role > here. > > Good luck. > > On Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM Володимир Іванець, < > volodyaivan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Sergiu, >> >> We allow multiple contacts to register on single account. They can have >> different properties. On step 1 I'm looking for something specific which >> can be different for different contacts. If I understood correctly >> *setbflag* and *isbflagset* can set and check flags for different >> branches independently. >> >> Thank you! >> >> пт, 24 трав. 2019 о 18:14 Sergiu Pojoga <pojo...@gmail.com> пише: >> >>> I might be wrong, but isn't ACK part of a transaction? If so, you'd need >>> to use *setflag*/*isflagset* >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Володимир Іванець < >>> volodyaivan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everyone! >>>> >>>> I'm not sure if I correctly understood the description of functions >>>> *isbflagset* and *isbflagset* so once again I'm asking for help :) >>>> >>>> Here is what I do: >>>> 1. Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup of >>>> available contacts and then few checks in branch_route. I'm adding >>>> *setbflag("17", >>>> $T_branch_idx);* there. >>>> 2. Later in route[NATMANAGE] I added *if (isbflagset("17", >>>> $T_branch_idx)) {* and additional logic. *isbflagset* results in *true* >>>> (for same INVITE). >>>> 3. Finally one of UACs responds with 200 OK. Asterisk generates ACK >>>> packet that gets in route[NATMANAGE]. *isbflagset* results in *false*. >>>> >>>> So my question is: shouldn't *isbflagset* be *true* for ACK too since >>>> it's the same branch or I interpreted these fenctions incorrectly? >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot! >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users