I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter to allocate new memory for newbody?
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mico...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len? > > Daniel > > On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote: > > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right > away. > > > > { > > . > > . > > . > > body.s = get_body(msg); > > if (body.s == 0) { > > LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf); > > // body.len = strlen(body.s); > > if (body.len == 0) { > > LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0); > > if (!l) { > > LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > > > if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) { > > LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > } > > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum, > > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function > > is above code. > > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with > > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for > > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to > > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus: > > > > if (SIP_REQUEST &METHOD_INVITE) { > > insert_data_htable("some data"); > > other_process(msg); > > }else if(SIP_REPLY){ > > get_data_htable("some data"); > > other_process(msg); > > } > > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message > lump. > > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What > > is it's problem? > > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or > > othet_process function, i dont have this issue. > > With best regards. > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla > > <mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is > >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Daniel > >> > >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean? > >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE > >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: <core> > >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out > >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) - > >>> aborting > >>> > >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio? > >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump. > >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module) > >>> in Kamailio developer forum <sr-...@lists.kamailio.org> > >>> With Best Regards. > >>> > >> -- > >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com > >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > >> > > > > -- > > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com > www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > >
_______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users@lists.kamailio.org https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users